|
As the Vietnam War fades into the past, the struggle for
reinterpretation continues. One area that has received
insufficient attention is war resistance. The script offered
in public circles often reads like this: the war has ended for
resisters; isolated numbers of people resisted military service,
most of them "draft dodgers"; all of the legal issues
surrounding military resisters were resolved - they eventually
"got off"; and people only refuse military service
when they face a draft.
These myths, like most others about the war, are designed to
influence future generations of potential warriors. The reality
of the Vietnam Era is that large numbers of people resisted
military service in different ways. Some were facing the draft
while others resisted after enlisting in the military. Universal
amnesty was never granted to war resisters. Here are the facts:
War Resisters and the Courts
Draft Law Violators - During the entire Vietnam War, 209,517
young men were formally accused of violating draft laws.
Government officials estimate that another 360,000 were never
formally accused. Of the former group, 25,000 indictments were
handed down; 8,750 were convicted; and just under 4,000 served
jail time.
Military Resisters -
It is difficult to say how many military
service members were prosecuted for offenses growing out of
opposition to the Southeast Asia War. Most estimates consider
the rates at which service members went AWOL (absent without
leave) or deserted – commonly referred to as "absence offenses."
AWOL and desertion rates hit an all-time high during the Vietnam
War, 1971 and 1972 being the peak years. The Pentagon documents
1,500,000 instances of AWOL and desertion during the war.
Official estimates of the actual number of service members who
went AWOL or deserted run between 500,000 (Pentagon) and 550,000
(officials in the Ford Administration). It is important to
remember that not all service members who received bad
discharges for offenses related to the war were absentees.
Adding other types of anti-war activities for which service
members were prosecuted significantly increases these figures.
Many went to jail and/or received bad discharges.*
Resisters in Exile
Estimates of the number of draft and military resisters who went
into exile during the Vietnam Era vary widely. The best estimate
is about 100,000, at least 90% of whom went to Canada. How many
are still living abroad is unknown. The New York Times estimates
that 25,000 draft resisters still live in Canada, an estimate
which seems high by most accounts. (This figure does not include
active duty service members who went into exile.) There are no
reliable estimates: it is most likely still in the thousands.
Today military resisters who return to the United States may
still face the possibility of punishment in the form of criminal
prosecution or a bad discharge. GI resisters, including those
living in exile, remain in legal jeopardy. No universal amnesty
was ever granted them. The two 1970s limited relief programs
expired decades ago. Every year a small number are arrested upon
returning to the US. For example, Richard Allen Shields, who
went AWOL from an Army base in Alaska in 1972, was arrested
March 22, 2000 on the US-Canadian border (in Metaline Falls, WA)
by U.S. Customs agents as he was attempting to drive a lumber
truck across the border. Shields was taken to Fort Sill,
Oklahoma and discharged from the Army with an "Other Than
Honorable" discharge in April of 2000.
Relief for War Resisters
Two programs providing limited legal relief for draft and
military resisters were implemented in the 1970s. Military
resisters and draft evaders were treated differently from each
other in both Ford and Carter programs.
Ford Clemency Program (1974)
In 1974, President Ford established a program of partial relief
for war resisters. This clemency program was considered a
complement to President Ford's pardon of President Nixon, who
had resigned from office in lieu of likely removal by Congress.
The program covered the following categories of persons:
convicted draft violators, convicted military deserters and
AWOL's, draft violators who had never been tried, and veterans
with less than honorable discharges for absence offenses.
The Ford program was widely regarded as a failure, even by
people who administered it.The conditions under which a person
could receive relief were onerous and discriminatory. Persons
receiving clemency were required to do up to 24 months of
alternative service and were required sign broad oath of
allegiance to the United States.
In addition to these measures, military deserters automatically
received bad discharges ("Undesirable"), although they could
later apply to get them changed to "Clemency Discharges"
(considered "Other Than Honorable") after performing 24 months
of service. Under the plan, GI participants would automatically
lose all veterans benefits, unlike many other veterans with less
than honorable discharges.
The program was widely regarded as a failure, even by people who
administered it. Only 27,000 of the 350,000 eligible persons
applied; 21,800 were granted clemency, mostly men living in the
U.S., not exiles. Those granted clemency were almost equally
divided between "draft offenders" and "military offenders." Most
exile groups based in Canada, Sweden, Britain and France
endorsed a boycott of the Ford program because of its punitive
nature. The "oath of allegiance" requirement was considered
especially offensive given the generous treatment of Nixon.
Nixon received a pardon, pension, and was not required to swear
allegiance to the U.S. despite his role in undermining
democracy. Program administrators estimated that about 566,000
military "offenders" were still in need of relief after the Ford
program ended, an ultimate indicator of the program's failure.
Carter Program (1977)
In 1977, President Carter established two programs to assist war
resisters. In January of 1977 he declared an unconditional
amnesty for draft resisters, both accused and those who could
face possible prosecution. Later that year, he set up the two
stage "pardon" process for military absentees.
Once again, draft evaders and military absentees were treated
differently.
Draft evaders were granted unconditional amnesty automatically
if there were no other legal charges pending. They would not
have a criminal record. Young men who were Unfortunately,
universal and unconditional amnesty was never granted to
military resisters, considered draft evaders did not have to
apply (in any formal sense) to get amnesty. It was a blanket
amnesty granted to all draft evaders whether they had been
engaged in a legal process or not. This is why no figure exists
for the real number of draft evaders who benefited from the
Carter program. This includes people who were never prosecuted,
people who were investigated and not prosecuted, people who were
indicted, people for whom charges had been brought, etc. The
only restriction is that the person not have other (non-draft
evasion) charges pending against them. So a draft evader who had
criminal charges pending for participating in a protest would
not have those protest-related charges dropped, only the draft
evasion charges.
Similarly, military deserters and AWOL's could apply for a
limited pardon if there were no other charges pending. Under the
Carter program deserters would automatically receive a less than
honorable discharge ("Undesirable"), but could apply for an
upgrade later. The upgrade would not be automatic and few
veterans received them. They were barred from receiving veterans
benefits, unlike many other vets with less than honorable
discharges. Military resisters had to apply for relief within a
certain time frame, about 5-6 months, during 1977. Only 4,200 of
them were considered eligible for the program; less than 25% of
them were processed and received the less-than-honorable
discharge. The program allowed for a case-by-case review of
potentially another 430,000 cases of veterans with bad
discharges; yet only 16,277 benefited from this procedure.
The Carter program was more successful than the Ford program
despite its serious limitations. Many of the resisters
(especially military absentees) had trouble surviving in other
countries. Exile groups urged people to take advantage of the
Carter program and work from within the US for a full amnesty.
One factor leading resisters to remain in exile was the poor
advertising of the details of the Carter relief program (1977)
in the aftermath of what was regarded as a highly discriminatory
and defective Ford Clemency program (1974). Congress refused to
fund the Carter program fully. Both relief programs had
conditions many exiles found hard to accept. Finally, the period
of time under which one could apply for relief was sharply
limited.
Unfortunately, universal and unconditional amnesty was never
granted to military resisters. It is estimated that only 28,420
Vietnam Era military resisters received any form of legal relief
– many of them received bad discharges – while another 550,000
never received any form of relief. To place this figure in
perspective, the number of ex-GI's who never received legal
relief roughly equals the number of soldiers who participated in
the Gulf War of 1990 and 1991. This is another way in which our
country has yet to fully come to terms with the legacy of the
war in Southeast Asia.
|